<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proposed tenancy bill a pointless exercise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.propertyinvestor.info/news/proposed-tenancy-bill-a-pointless-exercise/47/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.propertyinvestor.info/news/proposed-tenancy-bill-a-pointless-exercise/47/</link>
	<description>Andrew King</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 05:10:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ray clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.propertyinvestor.info/news/proposed-tenancy-bill-a-pointless-exercise/47/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>ray clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 16:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.propertyinvestor.info/articles/proposed-tenancy-bill-a-pointless-exercise/47/#comment-211</guid>
		<description>We had quite a deal to do with Maryan Street over tis issue as she is one of the Birkenhead based &quot;Labour North&quot; LIST members of Parliament and personally spoke to Maryon on several occisions over her bill. We were very unimpressed because Ms Street seemed to dodge the Insurance Councils position. Futhermore this article is the first evidence seen where Insurance Council regretted thier pursuit of the Dunedin excercise. Ms Street did not convey that to us. Clearly too much politics involved. Clearly the Government will not give over despite Insurance Councils decision not to pursue. That info I might add has not been conveyed to us by our Local Insurance broker where we deal with a very large well known Insurance Company and has all our business. The idea of the Tenant carrying the Insurance is ridiculous and only wants a payment failure to can the deal while Landlords track record goes to the wind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had quite a deal to do with Maryan Street over tis issue as she is one of the Birkenhead based &#8220;Labour North&#8221; LIST members of Parliament and personally spoke to Maryon on several occisions over her bill. We were very unimpressed because Ms Street seemed to dodge the Insurance Councils position. Futhermore this article is the first evidence seen where Insurance Council regretted thier pursuit of the Dunedin excercise. Ms Street did not convey that to us. Clearly too much politics involved. Clearly the Government will not give over despite Insurance Councils decision not to pursue. That info I might add has not been conveyed to us by our Local Insurance broker where we deal with a very large well known Insurance Company and has all our business. The idea of the Tenant carrying the Insurance is ridiculous and only wants a payment failure to can the deal while Landlords track record goes to the wind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

